In re Reinstatement of Smith

Arizona Supreme Court

In re Reinstatement of Smith

890 P.2d 1140, 181 Ariz. 355, 1995 Ariz. LEXIS 13

CourtArizona Supreme Court

DecidedMarch 2, 1995

DocketNo. SB-94-0050-R; Disc. Comm. No. 93-1690

StatusPublished

This text of 890 P.2d 1140 (In re Reinstatement of Smith) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Arizona Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

In re Reinstatement of Smith, 890 P.2d 1140, 181 Ariz. 355, 1995 Ariz. LEXIS 13 (Ark. 1995).

Pincite

Opinion

ORDER

FELDMAN, Chief Justice.

Applicant GARTH VIRGIL SMITH, having filed an “Application for Reinstatement,” the Commission having filed a Disciplinary Commission Report, and the Court having granted Applicant GARTH VIRGIL SMITH’S Application for Reinstatement on July 6, 1994,

IT IS ORDERED that GARTH VIRGIL SMITH be and hereby is reinstated as a member of the State Bar of Arizona, that he shall continue to comply with the Therapeutic Contract he entered into with the Membership Assistance Program of the State Bar of Arizona on November 20, 1992, and that he shall abide by the joint stipulation filed with the State Bar of Arizona in this matter on January 11, 1994, which provides that he will not resume the practice of law in Arizona until the pending disciplinary proceedings are concluded.

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the reinstatement is effective, nunc pro tunc, as of July 6, 1994.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

ORDER

FELDMAN, Chief Justice.

Applicant GARTH VIRGIL SMITH, having filed an “Application for Reinstatement,” the Commission having filed a Disciplinary Commission Report, and the Court having granted Applicant GARTH VIRGIL SMITH’S Application for Reinstatement on July 6, 1994,

IT IS ORDERED that GARTH VIRGIL SMITH be and hereby is reinstated as a member of the State Bar of Arizona, that he shall continue to comply with the Therapeutic Contract he entered into with the Membership Assistance Program of the State Bar of Arizona on November 20, 1992, and that he shall abide by the joint stipulation filed with the State Bar of Arizona in this matter on January 11, 1994, which provides that he will not resume the practice of law in Arizona until the pending disciplinary proceedings are concluded.

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the reinstatement is effective, nunc pro tunc, as of July 6, 1994.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

890 P.2d 1140, 181 Ariz. 355, 1995 Ariz. LEXIS 13, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-reinstatement-of-smith-ariz-1995.