In re Reinstatement of Rogers

Court of Appeals of Maryland

In re Reinstatement of Rogers

168 A.3d 20, 455 Md. 375

Court of Appeals of Maryland·Decided August 24, 2017·No. Misc. Docket AG No. 126·Published

Opinion

ORDER

Upon consideration of the Petition for Reinstatement of William Norman Rogers and the response filed thereto by Bar Counsel, in the above captioned case, it is this 24th day of August, 2017,

ORDERED, by the Court of Appeals of Maryland, a majority of the Court concurring, that the petition be, and it is hereby, GRANTED, and the petitioner, William Norman Rogers, be, and is hereby, reinstated to the practice of law in this State; and it is further

ORDERED, that the Clerk of the Court shall replace the name of William Norman Rogers upon the register of attorneys entitled to practice law in this State and certify that fact to the Trustees of the Client Protection Fund and the Clerks of all judicial tribunals in this state. '

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

ORDER

Upon consideration of the Petition for Reinstatement of William Norman Rogers and the response filed thereto by Bar Counsel, in the above captioned case, it is this 24th day of August, 2017,

ORDERED, by the Court of Appeals of Maryland, a majority of the Court concurring, that the petition be, and it is hereby, GRANTED, and the petitioner, William Norman Rogers, be, and is hereby, reinstated to the practice of law in this State; and it is further

ORDERED, that the Clerk of the Court shall replace the name of William Norman Rogers upon the register of attorneys entitled to practice law in this State and certify that fact to the Trustees of the Client Protection Fund and the Clerks of all judicial tribunals in this state. '

In re Reinstatement of Rogers, 168 A.3d 20, 455 Md. 375 (Md. 2017).

Pincite

168 A.3d 20 (In re Reinstatement of Rogers) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.