In re Reinstatement of Robinson

Court of Appeals of Maryland

In re Reinstatement of Robinson

93 A.3d 697, 439 Md. 1, 2014 WL 2807653, 2014 Md. LEXIS 365

CourtCourt of Appeals of Maryland

DecidedJune 18, 2014

DocketMisc. Docket AG No. 51

StatusPublished

This text of 93 A.3d 697 (In re Reinstatement of Robinson) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Maryland primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

In re Reinstatement of Robinson, 93 A.3d 697, 439 Md. 1, 2014 WL 2807653, 2014 Md. LEXIS 365 (Md. 2014).

Pincite

Opinion

ORDER

The Court having considered the Petition for Reinstatement of Kenneth Michael Robinson and the response filed thereto by the Attorney Grievance Commission in the above captioned case, it is this 18th day of June, 2014

ORDERED, by the Court of Appeals of Maryland, that the petition be, and it is hereby, GRANTED, and the petitioner Kenneth Michael Robinson is hereby, reinstated by this Court to the practice of law in Maryland, and it is further

ORDERED, that the Clerk of this Court shall replace the name of Kenneth Michael Robinson on the register of the attorneys in this Court and certify that fact to the Trustees of the Client Protection Fund and to the Clerks of all judicial tribunals in this State.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

ORDER

The Court having considered the Petition for Reinstatement of Kenneth Michael Robinson and the response filed thereto by the Attorney Grievance Commission in the above captioned case, it is this 18th day of June, 2014

ORDERED, by the Court of Appeals of Maryland, that the petition be, and it is hereby, GRANTED, and the petitioner Kenneth Michael Robinson is hereby, reinstated by this Court to the practice of law in Maryland, and it is further

ORDERED, that the Clerk of this Court shall replace the name of Kenneth Michael Robinson on the register of the attorneys in this Court and certify that fact to the Trustees of the Client Protection Fund and to the Clerks of all judicial tribunals in this State.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

93 A.3d 697, 439 Md. 1, 2014 WL 2807653, 2014 Md. LEXIS 365, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-reinstatement-of-robinson-md-2014.