In Re: Reinstatement of Randolph Goldberg

CourtNevada Supreme Court
DecidedDecember 28, 2018
Docket76355
StatusUnpublished

This text of In Re: Reinstatement of Randolph Goldberg (In Re: Reinstatement of Randolph Goldberg) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Nevada Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
In Re: Reinstatement of Randolph Goldberg, (Neb. 2018).

Opinion

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEVADA

IN THE MATTER OF No. 76355 REINSTATEMENT OF RANDOLPH H. D GOLDBERG, BAR NO, 5970. DEL 2 8 2018 OLE

ORDER OF REINSTATEMENT This is an automatic review of a Southern Nevada Discipliliary Board hearing panel's recommendation to grant suspended attorney Randolph H. Goldberg's petition for reinstatement.' Goldberg was suspended from the practice of law for four years and nine months starting on April 25, 2013. He was also required to complete 12 CLE credits in office management and 3 additional CLE credits in ethics, pay a $5,000 fine, pay the costs of the disciplinary proceeding, and, upon reinstatement, have a mentor with a least 10 years of general practice experience for two years. Goldberg's suspension term has expired and the panel has recommended he be reinstated to the practice of law in Nevada subject to certain conditions. Based on our de novo review, we agree with the panel's conclusion that Goldberg has satisfied his burden in seeking reinstatement by clear and convincing evidence. See SCR 116(2); Application of Wright, 75 Nev. 111, 112-13, 335 P.3d 609, 610 (1959) (reviewing a petition for reinstatement de novo). We therefore approve the panel's recommendation that the petition be granted and Goldberg be reinstated subject to certain conditions. Accordingly, Randolph H. Goldberg is hereby reinstated to the practice of law in Nevada on the following conditions: Goldberg shall (1)

SUPREME COURT 1 Pursuant to NRAP 34(0(1), we have determined that oral argument OF NEVADA is not warranted in this matter. (0) 1947A 4S) )o 9 io(632, complete 20 hours of pro bono service monthly for five years; (2) provide quarterly reports to the State Bar; (3) continue counseling by either seeing a stress management counselor or a psychotherapist once per month for two years, with the treating professional providing quarterly reports to the State Bar; (4) have a mentor with at least 10 years' experience in general practice, who is not also his business partner, for two years; and (5) pay the costs of the reinstatement proceeding, including $2,500 under SCR 120, within 30 days of this order. It is so ORDERED.

Owten-t, Cherry

Ade. J. ef2t.Lin , J. Piskering Hardesty

VA atajt(7,, J. Parraguirre Stiglich

DOUGLAS, C.J., dissenting: I dissent at this time.

CA. Douglas

cc: Chair, Southern Nevada Disciplinary Board Lipson Neilson P.C. Bar Counsel, State Bar of Nevada Executive Director, State Bar of Nevada Perry Thompson, Admissions Office, U.S. Supreme Court SUPREME COURT OF NEVADA 2 10) 1947A en

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

State v. Connor G. Spies
335 P.3d 609 (Idaho Court of Appeals, 2014)
In re Wright
335 P.2d 609 (Nevada Supreme Court, 1959)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
In Re: Reinstatement of Randolph Goldberg, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-reinstatement-of-randolph-goldberg-nev-2018.