In re Reinschreiber

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

In re Reinschreiber

74 A.D.2d 638, 425 N.Y.S.2d 531, 1980 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 10315

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedFebruary 25, 1980

StatusPublished

This text of 74 A.D.2d 638 (In re Reinschreiber) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

In re Reinschreiber, 74 A.D.2d 638, 425 N.Y.S.2d 531, 1980 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 10315 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1980).

Pincite

Opinion

The appeals are from (1) an order of the Supreme Court, Westchester County, entered July 23, 1979, which, inter alia, enjoined the appellant from pursuing any legal action in connection with its claim against the receiver of certain corporations and (2) as limited by the appellant’s brief, stated portions of a further order of the same court, entered September 27, 1979 which, inter alia, upon reargument adhered to its original determination. Appeal from order entered July 23, 1979 dismissed as academic. It was superseded by the order entered September 27, 1979. Order entered September 27, 1979 affirmed insofar as appealed from. The respondent is awarded one bill of $50 costs and disbursements. Special Term did not abuse its discretion in refusing permission to the appellant to sue the receiver. The appellant did not adduce prima facie evidence to show that the receiver improperly preferred creditors of the same class. Any promise the receiver may have made to the appellant guaranteeing payment independently of his statutory and fiduciary responsibilities was beyond the scope of his authority. While a detrimental reliance upon such a promise may be the basis for a cause of action against the receiver as an individual, no such showing has been made. Rabin, J. P., Cohalan, O’Connor and Weinstein, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

The appeals are from (1) an order of the Supreme Court, Westchester County, entered July 23, 1979, which, inter alia, enjoined the appellant from pursuing any legal action in connection with its claim against the receiver of certain corporations and (2) as limited by the appellant’s brief, stated portions of a further order of the same court, entered September 27, 1979 which, inter alia, upon reargument adhered to its original determination. Appeal from order entered July 23, 1979 dismissed as academic. It was superseded by the order entered September 27, 1979. Order entered September 27, 1979 affirmed insofar as appealed from. The respondent is awarded one bill of $50 costs and disbursements. Special Term did not abuse its discretion in refusing permission to the appellant to sue the receiver. The appellant did not adduce prima facie evidence to show that the receiver improperly preferred creditors of the same class. Any promise the receiver may have made to the appellant guaranteeing payment independently of his statutory and fiduciary responsibilities was beyond the scope of his authority. While a detrimental reliance upon such a promise may be the basis for a cause of action against the receiver as an individual, no such showing has been made. Rabin, J. P., Cohalan, O’Connor and Weinstein, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

74 A.D.2d 638, 425 N.Y.S.2d 531, 1980 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 10315, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-reinschreiber-nyappdiv-1980.