In re Reinauer Oil Transport, Inc.

D. Massachusetts

In re Reinauer Oil Transport, Inc.

19 F.R.D. 5

District Court, D. Massachusetts·Decided March 8, 1956·No. No. 52-58·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

FORD, District Judge.

Requests under Admiralty Rule 32B and Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, Rule 36, 28 U.S.C.A., should be used to obtain admission of facts about which there is no real dispute. They should deal with singular relevant facts which can be clearly admitted or denied and not with complicated situations involving many distinct and vital controversial is-* sues of facts. They should not be used as a means of covering the entire case and every item of evidence. Exceptions sustained. 4 Moore, Federal Practice, § 36.04, p. 2711; Alaska Credit Bureau of Juneau v. Stevenson, D.C., 15 F.R.D. 409; Knowlton v. Atchison, T. & S. F. Ry. Co., D.C., 11 F.R.D. 62.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

FORD, District Judge.

Requests under Admiralty Rule 32B and Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, Rule 36, 28 U.S.C.A., should be used to obtain admission of facts about which there is no real dispute. They should deal with singular relevant facts which can be clearly admitted or denied and not with complicated situations involving many distinct and vital controversial is-* sues of facts. They should not be used as a means of covering the entire case and every item of evidence. Exceptions sustained. 4 Moore, Federal Practice, § 36.04, p. 2711; Alaska Credit Bureau of Juneau v. Stevenson, D.C., 15 F.R.D. 409; Knowlton v. Atchison, T. & S. F. Ry. Co., D.C., 11 F.R.D. 62.

In re Reinauer Oil Transport, Inc., 19 F.R.D. 5 (D. Mass. 1956).

Pincite

19 F.R.D. 5 (In re Reinauer Oil Transport, Inc.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related