In re Reinauer Oil Transport, Inc.

19 F.R.D. 5
CourtDistrict Court, D. Massachusetts
DecidedMarch 8, 1956
DocketNo. 52-58
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 19 F.R.D. 5 (In re Reinauer Oil Transport, Inc.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court, D. Massachusetts primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
In re Reinauer Oil Transport, Inc., 19 F.R.D. 5 (D. Mass. 1956).

Opinion

FORD, District Judge.

Requests under Admiralty Rule 32B and Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, Rule 36, 28 U.S.C.A., should be used to obtain admission of facts about which there is no real dispute. They should deal with singular relevant facts which can be clearly admitted or denied and not with complicated situations involving many distinct and vital controversial is-* sues of facts. They should not be used as a means of covering the entire case and every item of evidence. Exceptions sustained. 4 Moore, Federal Practice, § 36.04, p. 2711; Alaska Credit Bureau of Juneau v. Stevenson, D.C., 15 F.R.D. 409; Knowlton v. Atchison, T. & S. F. Ry. Co., D.C., 11 F.R.D. 62.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Lewis v. Kenady
894 S.W.2d 619 (Kentucky Supreme Court, 1994)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
19 F.R.D. 5, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-reinauer-oil-transport-inc-mad-1956.