In re Reilly

211 A.D.2d 145, 627 N.Y.S.2d 555, 1995 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 5521
CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
DecidedMay 23, 1995
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 211 A.D.2d 145 (In re Reilly) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
In re Reilly, 211 A.D.2d 145, 627 N.Y.S.2d 555, 1995 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 5521 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1995).

Opinion

OPINION OF THE COURT

Per Curiam.

Respondent, Paul G. Reilly, Jr., was admitted to the practice of law in the State of New York by the First Judicial Depart[146]*146ment on March 13, 1961, under the name Paul Gorman Reilly, Jr. At all times relevant herein respondent has maintained an office for the practice of law within the First Judicial Department.

Petitioner Departmental Disciplinary Committee seeks an order.-pursuant to 22 NYCRR 603.4 (e) (1) (i) suspending respondent from the practice of law forthwith based upon his failure to cooperate with the Committee in its investigation of allegations of professional misconduct, i.e., that respondent has neglected certain estate-related matters and that he has failed to account for the assets in his possession belonging to those estates. We note that respondent was held in contempt by the Surrogate’s Court, New York County (Roth, S.), for his neglect and failure to account, and an order of commitment was issued against him. Respondent has failed to comply with the Committee’s subpoena requiring him to appear despite being given several opportunities to do so and, though served with a copy of the Committee’s motion to suspend, he has failed to interpose a response.

Under these circumstances, the Committee’s motion should be granted and respondent should be suspended from the practice of law, effective immediately.

Sullivan, J. P., Rosenberger, Ellerin, Ross and Williams, JJ., concur.

Application granted and respondent suspended from practice as an attorney and counselor-at-law in the State of New York, effective immediately, pending the disposition of charges, and the further order of this Court, as indicated.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

In re Reilly
219 A.D.2d 96 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1996)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
211 A.D.2d 145, 627 N.Y.S.2d 555, 1995 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 5521, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-reilly-nyappdiv-1995.