in Re: Reidie Jackson

CourtCourt of Appeals of Texas
DecidedMarch 3, 2011
Docket13-11-00114-CV
StatusPublished

This text of in Re: Reidie Jackson (in Re: Reidie Jackson) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
in Re: Reidie Jackson, (Tex. Ct. App. 2011).

Opinion

NUMBER 13-11-00114-CV

COURT OF APPEALS

THIRTEENTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS

CORPUS CHRISTI - EDINBURG

IN RE REIDIE JACKSON

On Petition for Writ of Mandamus

MEMORANDUM OPINION

Before Justices Garza, Vela and Perkes

Memorandum Opinion Per Curiam

Relator, Reidie Jackson, has filed a petition for writ of mandamus alleging that the Honorable Ben Hardin, presiding judge of the 23rd Judicial District Court of Matagorda County, Texas, abused his discretion by rendering an order on January 12, 2001, dismissing relator’s suit against the State of Texas for want of jurisdiction.

Having reviewed and fully considered relator’s petition, this Court is of the opinion that relator has not shown himself entitled to the relief requested and that the petition should be denied.  Accordingly, relator’s petition for writ of mandamus is DENIED.

                                                                                                PER CURIAM

Delivered and filed the

3rd day of March, 2011.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
in Re: Reidie Jackson, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-reidie-jackson-texapp-2011.