In re Reid Bros.

273 F. 368, 51 App. D.C. 6, 1921 U.S. App. LEXIS 1473
CourtDistrict Court, District of Columbia
DecidedMay 2, 1921
DocketNo. 1273
StatusPublished

This text of 273 F. 368 (In re Reid Bros.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court, District of Columbia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
In re Reid Bros., 273 F. 368, 51 App. D.C. 6, 1921 U.S. App. LEXIS 1473 (D.D.C. 1921).

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Appeal from a decision of the Patent Office refusing to register as a trade-mark for hot-water bottles, ice bags, and certain other hospital supplies, a shield bearing the word “Efficiency” in ordinary block type; the ground of the decision being that the mark is descriptive.

We are constrained to hold that this case is controlled by our decision in Re Crosby Steam Gage & Valve Co., 47 App. D. C. 382, in which it was ruled that the words “High Efficiency” were not register-, able as a trade-mark for safety relief valves, because “more descriptive than suggestive.”

Accordingly the decision is affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
273 F. 368, 51 App. D.C. 6, 1921 U.S. App. LEXIS 1473, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-reid-bros-dcd-1921.