In re Reichmanis

Supreme Court of South Carolina

In re Reichmanis

584 S.E.2d 365, 355 S.C. 85, 2003 S.C. LEXIS 170

Supreme Court of South Carolina·Decided July 25, 2003·Published

Opinion

ORDER

Pursuant to the Rule 28(b)(6)(A), of the Rules of Lawyer Disciplinary Enforcement (“RLDE”), we VACATE the interim suspension placed on Maria Reichmanis and place her on incapacity inactive status based on the severity of her documented medical condition.

Further, pursuant to Rule 28(b)(6)(C), RLDE, we defer all pending disciplinary matters against Ms. Reichmanis because she has established that she is unable to assist in her own defense. This stay of the proceedings will be in effect until Ms. Reichmanis attempts to change her incapacity inactive status.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

/s/JEAN H. TOAL, C.J.

/s/JAMES E. MOORE, J.

/s/JOHN H. WALLER, JR., J.

/s/E.C. BURNETT, III, J.

PLEICONES, J., not participating.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

ORDER

Pursuant to the Rule 28(b)(6)(A), of the Rules of Lawyer Disciplinary Enforcement (“RLDE”), we VACATE the interim suspension placed on Maria Reichmanis and place her on incapacity inactive status based on the severity of her documented medical condition.

Further, pursuant to Rule 28(b)(6)(C), RLDE, we defer all pending disciplinary matters against Ms. Reichmanis because she has established that she is unable to assist in her own defense. This stay of the proceedings will be in effect until Ms. Reichmanis attempts to change her incapacity inactive status.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

/s/JEAN H. TOAL, C.J.

/s/JAMES E. MOORE, J.

/s/JOHN H. WALLER, JR., J.

/s/E.C. BURNETT, III, J.

PLEICONES, J., not participating.

In re Reichmanis, 584 S.E.2d 365, 355 S.C. 85, 2003 S.C. LEXIS 170 (S.C. 2003).

Pincite

584 S.E.2d 365 (In re Reichmanis) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.