In re Reichmanis

Supreme Court of South Carolina

In re Reichmanis

584 S.E.2d 365, 355 S.C. 85, 2003 S.C. LEXIS 170

DecidedJuly 25, 2003

StatusPublished

This text of 584 S.E.2d 365 (In re Reichmanis) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of South Carolina primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

In re Reichmanis, 584 S.E.2d 365, 355 S.C. 85, 2003 S.C. LEXIS 170 (S.C. 2003).

Pincite

Opinion

ORDER

Pursuant to the Rule 28(b)(6)(A), of the Rules of Lawyer Disciplinary Enforcement (“RLDE”), we VACATE the interim suspension placed on Maria Reichmanis and place her on incapacity inactive status based on the severity of her documented medical condition.

Further, pursuant to Rule 28(b)(6)(C), RLDE, we defer all pending disciplinary matters against Ms. Reichmanis because she has established that she is unable to assist in her own defense. This stay of the proceedings will be in effect until Ms. Reichmanis attempts to change her incapacity inactive status.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

/s/JEAN H. TOAL, C.J.

/s/JAMES E. MOORE, J.

/s/JOHN H. WALLER, JR., J.

/s/E.C. BURNETT, III, J.

PLEICONES, J., not participating.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI