In re Regojo
This text of 182 A.3d 916 (In re Regojo) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of New Jersey primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
The Office of Attorney Ethics having filed with the Court a petition pursuant to Rule 1:20-3(g) (4) and Rule 1:20-11, seeking the immediate temporary suspension from practice of FERNAN DO J. REGOJO
**44of NORTH BERGEN, who was admitted to the bar of this State in 1981, and good cause appearing;
It is ORDERED that FERNANDO J. REGOJO is temporarily suspended from the practice of law, effective immediately and until the further Order of this Court; and it is further *917ORDERED that FERNANDO J. REGOJO be restrained and enjoined from practicing law during the period of his suspension; and it is further
ORDERED that all funds, if any, currently existing or hereinafter deposited in any New Jersey financial institution maintained by FERNANDO J. REGOJO pursuant to Rule 1:21-6 or otherwise used in connection with respondent's practice of law, including the Bank of America personal account, ending in # 4429, used by FERNANDO J. REGOJO, shall be restrained from disbursement expect on application to this Court for good cause shown, pending the further Order of this Court; and it is further
ORDERED that FERNANDO J. REGOJO comply with Rule 1:20-20 dealing with suspended attorneys; and it is further
ORDERED that the entire record of this matter be made a permanent part of the respondent's file as an attorney at law of this State.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
182 A.3d 916, 233 N.J. 43, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-regojo-nj-2018.