In re Regojo

Supreme Court of New Jersey

In re Regojo

891 A.2d 611, 186 N.J. 66, 2006 N.J. LEXIS 30

Supreme Court of New Jersey·Decided February 8, 2006·Published

Opinion

ORDER

The Disciplinary Review Board having filed with the Court its decision in DRB 05-294, concluding that FERNANDO J. REGOJO of NORTH BERGEN, who was admitted to the bar of this State in 1981, should be censured for violating RPC 1.1(a) (gross [67] neglect) and RPC 1.3 (lack of diligence), and good cause appearing;

It is ORDERED that FERNANDO J. REGOJO is hereby censured; and it is further

ORDERED that the entire record of this matter be made a permanent part of respondent’s file as an attorney at law of this State; and it is further

ORDERED that respondent reimburse the Disciplinary Oversight Committee for appropriate administrative costs and actual expenses incurred in the prosecution of this matter, as provided in Rule 1:20-17.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

ORDER

The Disciplinary Review Board having filed with the Court its decision in DRB 05-294, concluding that FERNANDO J. REGOJO of NORTH BERGEN, who was admitted to the bar of this State in 1981, should be censured for violating RPC 1.1(a) (gross [67] neglect) and RPC 1.3 (lack of diligence), and good cause appearing;

It is ORDERED that FERNANDO J. REGOJO is hereby censured; and it is further

ORDERED that the entire record of this matter be made a permanent part of respondent’s file as an attorney at law of this State; and it is further

ORDERED that respondent reimburse the Disciplinary Oversight Committee for appropriate administrative costs and actual expenses incurred in the prosecution of this matter, as provided in Rule 1:20-17.

In re Regojo, 891 A.2d 611, 186 N.J. 66, 2006 N.J. LEXIS 30 (N.J. 2006).

Pincite

891 A.2d 611 (In re Regojo) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.