In re Regojo

853 A.2d 231, 180 N.J. 523, 2004 N.J. LEXIS 922
Supreme Court of New Jersey·Decided July 26, 2004·Published

Opinion

ORDER

The Disciplinary Review Board having filed with the Court its decision in DRB 03-457, concluding that FERNANDO REGOJO of UNION CITY, who was admitted to the bar of this State in 1981, should be reprimanded for violating RPC l.l(a)(gross neglect), RPC 1.3(lack of diligence), RPC 1.4(a)(failure to communicate with client), and RPC 1.8(h)(negotiating a malpractice settlement with a client without advising the client to seek independent counsel), and good cause appearing;

It is ORDERED that FERNANDO REGOJO is hereby reprimanded; and it is further

ORDERED that the entire record of this matter be made a permanent part of respondent’s file as an attorney at law of this State; and it is further

ORDERED that respondent reimburse the Disciplinary Oversight Committee for appropriate administrative costs incurred in the prosecution of this matter.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

In re Regojo, 853 A.2d 231, 180 N.J. 523, 2004 N.J. LEXIS 922 (N.J. 2004).

853 A.2d 231 (In re Regojo) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.