in Re Reginald Ricks
This text of in Re Reginald Ricks (in Re Reginald Ricks) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Petition for Writ of Mandamus Dismissed and Memorandum Opinion filed August 23, 2012.
In The
Fourteenth Court of Appeals
NO. 14-12-00730-CR
IN RE REGINALD RICKS, Relator
ORIGINAL PROCEEDING WRIT OF MANDAMUS 263rd District Court Harris County, Texas Trial Court No. 1112841-A
MEMORANDUM O P I N I O N
On August 9, 2012, relator filed a petition for writ of mandamus in this Court. See Tex. Gov’t Code Ann. §22.221 (West 2004); see also Tex. R. App. P. 52. In the petition, relator asked this Court to compel the Honorable Jim Wallace, presiding judge of the 263rd District Court of Harris County, Texas, Leisa Hudson, the deputy court reporter of the 263rd District Court of Harris County, and Chris Daniel, the District Clerk of Harris, County, Texas. Relator's petition seeks a free record for use in preparing a post-conviction habeas application. We lack jurisdiction to grant the relief relator requests.
Our mandamus jurisdiction is limited. By statute, we have authority to issue a writ of mandamus against a judge of a district or county court in our court of appeals district and other writs as necessary to enforce our appellate jurisdiction. See Tex. Gov't. Code Ann. § 22.221 (West 2004). For a district clerk or court reporter to fall within our jurisdictional reach, relator must establish that the issuance of the writ of mandamus is necessary to enforce our jurisdiction. See In re Coronado, 980 S.W.2d 691, 692-93 (Tex. App. -- San Antonio 1998, orig. proceeding). We have no jurisdiction over original proceedings regarding relator's final conviction. Only the Texas Court of Criminal Appeals has jurisdiction over habeas corpus proceedings after final felony convictions. See Board of Pardons & Paroles ex rel. Keene v. Court of Appeals for the Eighth District, 910 S.W.2d 481, 483 (Tex. Crim. App. 1995); Tex. Code Crim. Proc. Ann. art. 11.07, § 3 (West Supp. 2011).
Accordingly, we dismiss relator's petition for writ of mandamus.
PER CURIAM
Panel consists of Justices Christopher, Jamison, and McCally. Do Not Publish — TEX. R. APP. P. 47.2(b).
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
in Re Reginald Ricks, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-reginald-ricks-texapp-2012.