In re Reginald P.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

In re Reginald P.

35 A.D.3d 201, 824 N.Y.S.2d 568

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedDecember 7, 2006

StatusPublished

This text of 35 A.D.3d 201 (In re Reginald P.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

In re Reginald P., 35 A.D.3d 201, 824 N.Y.S.2d 568 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2006).

Pincite

Opinion

Order of disposition, Family Court, Bronx County (Harold J. Lynch, J.), entered on or about July 28, 2004, which adjudicated appellant a juvenile delinquent upon a fact-finding determination that he had committed an act, which, if committed by an adult, would constitute the crime of attempted assault in the third degree, and placed him on probation for a period of one year, unanimously affirmed, without costs.

The court’s finding was based on legally sufficient evidence and was not against the weight of the evidence. There is no basis for disturbing the court’s determinations concerning credibility. The evidence disproved appellant’s justification defense beyond a reasonable doubt. Concur—Tom, J.E, Marlow, Williams, Catterson and Malone, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Order of disposition, Family Court, Bronx County (Harold J. Lynch, J.), entered on or about July 28, 2004, which adjudicated appellant a juvenile delinquent upon a fact-finding determination that he had committed an act, which, if committed by an adult, would constitute the crime of attempted assault in the third degree, and placed him on probation for a period of one year, unanimously affirmed, without costs.

The court’s finding was based on legally sufficient evidence and was not against the weight of the evidence. There is no basis for disturbing the court’s determinations concerning credibility. The evidence disproved appellant’s justification defense beyond a reasonable doubt. Concur—Tom, J.E, Marlow, Williams, Catterson and Malone, JJ.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

35 A.D.3d 201, 824 N.Y.S.2d 568, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-reginald-p-nyappdiv-2006.