in Re: Reginald Connally
This text of in Re: Reginald Connally (in Re: Reginald Connally) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Dismiss Writ and Opinion Filed July 11, 2013
S In The Court of Appeals Fifth District of Texas at Dallas
No. 05-13-00884-CV
IN RE REGINALD CONNALLY, Relator
On Appeal from the Criminal District Court No. 2 Dallas County, Texas Trial Court Cause No. W95-45897I(A)
MEMORANDUM OPINION Before Justices Bridges, Francis, and Lewis Opinion by Justice Bridges Before the Court is relator’s petition for writ of mandamus naming the district clerk as
respondent. The facts and issues are well known to the parties, so we need not recount them
herein. This Court does not have mandamus jurisdiction over the district clerk. See TEX. GOV=T
CODE ANN. ' 22.221 (West 2010). Accordingly, we DISMISS relator’s petition for writ of
mandamus for want of jurisdiction.
/David L. Bridges/ DAVID L. BRIDGES 130884F.P05 JUSTICE
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
in Re: Reginald Connally, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-reginald-connally-texapp-2013.