in Re: Regina Jones

CourtCourt of Appeals of Texas
DecidedApril 7, 2015
Docket05-15-00425-CV
StatusPublished

This text of in Re: Regina Jones (in Re: Regina Jones) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
in Re: Regina Jones, (Tex. Ct. App. 2015).

Opinion

Denied; and Opinion Filed April 7, 2015

S Court of Appeals In The

Fifth District of Texas at Dallas No. 05-15-00425-CV

IN RE REGINA JONES, Relator

On Appeal from the 192nd Judicial District Court Dallas County, Texas Trial Court Cause No. DC-12-04128-K

MEMORANDUM OPINION Before Justices Francis, Myers, and Schenck Opinion by Justice Myers Relator filed this petition for writ of mandamus requesting that the Court order the trial

court to vacate its January 12, 2015 order granting the motion to compel relator’s deposition and

its March 26, 2015 order striking relator’s pleadings and entering a default judgment against

relator for discovery abuse. Ordinarily, to obtain mandamus relief, a relator must show both that

the trial court has clearly abused its discretion and that relator has no adequate appellate remedy.

In re Prudential Ins. Co., 148 S.W.3d 124, 135–36 (Tex. 2004) (orig. proceeding). We conclude

the relator has failed to establish a right to relief.

We deny the petition for writ of mandamus. TEX. R. APP. P. 52.8.

/Lana Myers/ LANA MYERS 150425F.P05 JUSTICE

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

In Re Prudential Insurance Co. of America
148 S.W.3d 124 (Texas Supreme Court, 2004)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
in Re: Regina Jones, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-regina-jones-texapp-2015.