in Re: Regina Jones
This text of in Re: Regina Jones (in Re: Regina Jones) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Denied; and Opinion Filed April 7, 2015
S Court of Appeals In The
Fifth District of Texas at Dallas No. 05-15-00425-CV
IN RE REGINA JONES, Relator
On Appeal from the 192nd Judicial District Court Dallas County, Texas Trial Court Cause No. DC-12-04128-K
MEMORANDUM OPINION Before Justices Francis, Myers, and Schenck Opinion by Justice Myers Relator filed this petition for writ of mandamus requesting that the Court order the trial
court to vacate its January 12, 2015 order granting the motion to compel relator’s deposition and
its March 26, 2015 order striking relator’s pleadings and entering a default judgment against
relator for discovery abuse. Ordinarily, to obtain mandamus relief, a relator must show both that
the trial court has clearly abused its discretion and that relator has no adequate appellate remedy.
In re Prudential Ins. Co., 148 S.W.3d 124, 135–36 (Tex. 2004) (orig. proceeding). We conclude
the relator has failed to establish a right to relief.
We deny the petition for writ of mandamus. TEX. R. APP. P. 52.8.
/Lana Myers/ LANA MYERS 150425F.P05 JUSTICE
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
in Re: Regina Jones, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-regina-jones-texapp-2015.