In Re Reeves

291 A.2d 369, 60 N.J. 504, 1972 N.J. LEXIS 265
CourtSupreme Court of New Jersey
DecidedJune 5, 1972
StatusPublished
Cited by3 cases

This text of 291 A.2d 369 (In Re Reeves) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of New Jersey primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
In Re Reeves, 291 A.2d 369, 60 N.J. 504, 1972 N.J. LEXIS 265 (N.J. 1972).

Opinion

*505 The opinion of the Court was delivered

Pee Cukiam.

Defendant was convicted of contempt and sentenced to 60 days in jail. We certified his appeal before argument in the Appellate Division. We do not reach the issue which prompted certification because the conviction must be reversed for failure to comply with the rules relating to summary prosecutions for contempt. What started out as a proceeding to enforce a litigant’s right to moneys due from defendant under a support order became, without notice, a penal prosecution resulting in a fixed jail sentence. This, of course, violated the clear mandate of R. 1:10-2 to 4. See New Jersey Dep’t of Health v. Roselle, 34 N. J. 331 (1961); In re Carton, 48 N. J. 9 (1966). The rule relating to enforcement of a support order, R. 4:79-9(b), expressly refers to the basic contempt rules we have just cited.

The judgment is therefore reversed.

For reversal—Uhief Justice Weintkaub and Justices Jacobs, Ekancis, Peoctok, Hall, Schettino and Mountain—7.

Eor affirmance—Uone.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Pasqua v. Council
892 A.2d 663 (Supreme Court of New Jersey, 2006)
Essex County Welfare Bd. v. Perkins
336 A.2d 16 (New Jersey Superior Court App Division, 1975)
In Re Rosenblatt
291 A.2d 369 (Supreme Court of New Jersey, 1972)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
291 A.2d 369, 60 N.J. 504, 1972 N.J. LEXIS 265, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-reeves-nj-1972.