In re Reese

305 F. App'x 58
CourtCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
DecidedDecember 11, 2008
DocketNo. 08-1938
StatusPublished

This text of 305 F. App'x 58 (In re Reese) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
In re Reese, 305 F. App'x 58 (4th Cir. 2008).

Opinion

PER CURIAM:

Willie Lewis Reese petitions for a writ of mandamus, seeking orders relieving him of an allegedly illegal sentence and remanding him to the district court for re-sentencing and an evidentiary hearing concerning his counsel’s performance. We deny the petition.

Mandamus relief is available only when the petitioner has a clear right to the relief sought. In re: First Fed. Sav. & Loan Ass’n, 860 F.2d 135, 138 (4th Cir.1988). Further, mandamus is a drastic remedy and should be used only in extraordinary circumstances. Kerr v. United States Dist. Court, 426 U.S. 394, 402, 96 S.Ct. 2119, 48 L.Ed.2d 725 (1976); In re: Beard, 811 F.2d 818, 826 (4th Cir.1987).

The relief sought by Reese is not available by way of mandamus. Accordingly, although we grant leave to proceed in for-ma pauperis, we deny the petition for writ of mandamus. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

PETITION DENIED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

In Re Diana R. Beard, (Two Cases)
811 F.2d 818 (Fourth Circuit, 1987)
First Federal Savings & Loan Ass'n v. Baker
860 F.2d 135 (Fourth Circuit, 1988)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
305 F. App'x 58, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-reese-ca4-2008.