In re Reed

Supreme Court of Louisiana

In re Reed

947 So. 2d 710, 2007 WL 293306

Procedural entryThis page is a short order in In re Reed. Read the opinion of the Court — 997 So. 2d 527 →

Supreme Court of Louisiana·Decided February 1, 2007·No. No. 2006-B-2357·Published

Opinion

ATTORNEY DISCIPLINARY PROCEEDINGS

PER CURIAM.

The Office of Disciplinary Counsel seeks review of a recommendation of the disciplinary board that the formal charges against respondent, Andrew Reed, be dismissed. Having reviewed the record and the briefs of the parties, we find the disciplinary board reached the correct result in dismissing the formal charges.

Accordingly, it is the judgment of this court that the formal charges against respondent be dismissed.

KIMBALL and JOHNSON, JJ., would docket the case for oral argument.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

ATTORNEY DISCIPLINARY PROCEEDINGS

PER CURIAM.

The Office of Disciplinary Counsel seeks review of a recommendation of the disciplinary board that the formal charges against respondent, Andrew Reed, be dismissed. Having reviewed the record and the briefs of the parties, we find the disciplinary board reached the correct result in dismissing the formal charges.

Accordingly, it is the judgment of this court that the formal charges against respondent be dismissed.

KIMBALL and JOHNSON, JJ., would docket the case for oral argument.

In re Reed, 947 So. 2d 710, 2007 WL 293306 (La. 2007).

Pincite

947 So. 2d 710 (In re Reed) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.