In re Redd
This text of 155 F. App'x 702 (In re Redd) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Derrick Vincent Redd, a federal inmate, filed in this court a petition for writ of mandamus seeking an order compelling the district court to transfer his Fed. R.Crim.P. Rule 35 motion to this court because of the delay in deciding the motion. On October 26, 2005, the district court denied Redd’s Rule 35 motion. Accordingly, while we grant his motion to proceed in forma pauperis, we deny as moot his petition for a writ of mandamus. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before [703]*703the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
PETITION DENIED
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
155 F. App'x 702, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-redd-ca4-2005.