in Re: Red Frog Events, LLC

391 S.W.3d 341, 2013 WL 238707, 2013 Tex. App. LEXIS 265

Opinion

OPINION

Opinion by

Justice FILLMORE.

In this original mandamus proceeding, relator contends the trial court abused its discretion by compelling relator to produce documents relator asserts are irrelevant, overbroad, and not reasonably calculated to lead to admissible evidence. The facts and issues are well known to the parties, so we need not recount them herein. Based on the record before us, we conclude the trial court did not abuse its discretion by compelling production of the documents. See Tex.R.App. P. 52.8(a); In re Prudential Ins. Co., 148 S.W.3d 124, 135-36 (Tex.2004) (orig. proceeding); Walker v. Packer, 827 S.W.2d 833, 839-40 (Tex.1992) (orig. proceeding).

We DENY relator’s petition for writ of mandamus.