In re Recognizance of Tomer

50 A. 268, 19 Del. 31, 3 Penne. 31, 1900 Del. LEXIS 48
CourtNew York Court of General Session of the Peace
DecidedNovember 20, 1900
StatusPublished
Cited by3 cases

This text of 50 A. 268 (In re Recognizance of Tomer) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering New York Court of General Session of the Peace primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
In re Recognizance of Tomer, 50 A. 268, 19 Del. 31, 3 Penne. 31, 1900 Del. LEXIS 48 (N.Y. Super. Ct. 1900).

Opinion

Lore, C. J.:

I recall no practice of the kind referred to by the State, and it strikes me as' being a very remarkable practice,, unless under very peculiar circumstances. These men have simply entered into a recognizance to appear at this term of Court. Now they appear and while there is something in the office of the Attorney-General, there is nothing before us.

We decline to make the order asked for. They have met the condition of their recognizance and are entitled to go. The State can proceed again de nova.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Quillen v. Betts
98 A.2d 770 (Supreme Court of Delaware, 1953)
State Ex Rel. Odenwald v. District Court
38 P.2d 269 (Montana Supreme Court, 1934)
In re Killcourse
104 A. 837 (New York Court of General Session of the Peace, 1918)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
50 A. 268, 19 Del. 31, 3 Penne. 31, 1900 Del. LEXIS 48, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-recognizance-of-tomer-nygensess-1900.