In Re Reckinger's Estate

255 N.W. 213, 267 Mich. 391
CourtMichigan Supreme Court
DecidedJune 4, 1934
DocketDocket No. 160, Calendar No. 37,444.
StatusPublished
Cited by2 cases

This text of 255 N.W. 213 (In Re Reckinger's Estate) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Michigan Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
In Re Reckinger's Estate, 255 N.W. 213, 267 Mich. 391 (Mich. 1934).

Opinion

The will of Nicholas Reckinger was offered for probate in Wayne county. Objections to its probate were filed and motion to dismiss the proceeding was made on the ground that deceased was not a resident of Wayne county but was a resident of Macomb county at the time of his death. The contest was certified to the circuit court for trial. In circuit court the motion to dismiss was renewed, and granted.

In the briefs the only question argued is whether deceased was a resident of Wayne or Macomb county when he died. The question is one of fact. The facts are in dispute and the great preponderance of the testimony sustains the finding of the court that he was a resident of Macomb county.

The order dismissing the appeal and petition for probate of the will for lack of jurisdiction is affirmed, with costs.

NELSON SHARPE, C.J., and POTTER, NORTH, WIEST, BUTZEL, and EDWARD M. SHARPE, JJ., concurred. BUSHNELL, J., did not sit. *Page 393

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Wise v. Resta
142 N.W.2d 866 (Michigan Court of Appeals, 1966)
In Re Fox Estate
142 N.W.2d 866 (Michigan Court of Appeals, 1966)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
255 N.W. 213, 267 Mich. 391, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-reckingers-estate-mich-1934.