In re Rebecca M.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

In re Rebecca M.

278 A.D.2d 495, 718 N.Y.S.2d 653, 2000 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 13874

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedDecember 26, 2000

StatusPublished

This text of 278 A.D.2d 495 (In re Rebecca M.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

In re Rebecca M., 278 A.D.2d 495, 718 N.Y.S.2d 653, 2000 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 13874 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2000).

Pincite

Opinion

In a proceeding pursuant to Social Services Law § 384-b to terminate parental rights, the mother appeals from so much of a dispositional order of the Family Court, Kings County (Segal, J.), dated November 10, 1998, as, after fact-finding and dispositional hearings, terminated her parental rights, and St. Vincent’s Services for Children cross-appeals from so much of the same order as directed weekly visitation between Rebecca M. and her siblings.

Ordered that the cross appeal is dismissed as abandoned, without costs or disbursements; and it is further,

Ordered that the order of disposition is affirmed insofar as appealed from, without costs and disbursements.

The petitioner established by clear and convincing evidence that it used diligent efforts to encourage and strengthen the parental relationship (see, Matter of Richard W., 265 AD2d 685). Further, the termination of the mother’s parental rights is supported by a preponderance of the evidence (see, Matter of Star Leslie W., 63 NY2d 136), and the Family Court acted within its discretion by refusing to suspend the order (see, Family Ct Act §§ 631, 633). Friedmann, J. P., Krausman, H. Miller and Feuerstein, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

In a proceeding pursuant to Social Services Law § 384-b to terminate parental rights, the mother appeals from so much of a dispositional order of the Family Court, Kings County (Segal, J.), dated November 10, 1998, as, after fact-finding and dispositional hearings, terminated her parental rights, and St. Vincent’s Services for Children cross-appeals from so much of the same order as directed weekly visitation between Rebecca M. and her siblings.

Ordered that the cross appeal is dismissed as abandoned, without costs or disbursements; and it is further,

Ordered that the order of disposition is affirmed insofar as appealed from, without costs and disbursements.

The petitioner established by clear and convincing evidence that it used diligent efforts to encourage and strengthen the parental relationship (see, Matter of Richard W., 265 AD2d 685). Further, the termination of the mother’s parental rights is supported by a preponderance of the evidence (see, Matter of Star Leslie W., 63 NY2d 136), and the Family Court acted within its discretion by refusing to suspend the order (see, Family Ct Act §§ 631, 633). Friedmann, J. P., Krausman, H. Miller and Feuerstein, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

278 A.D.2d 495, 718 N.Y.S.2d 653, 2000 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 13874, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-rebecca-m-nyappdiv-2000.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack