In re Rebar Steel Antitrust Investigation

Supreme Court of Louisiana

In re Rebar Steel Antitrust Investigation

339 So. 2d 354, 1976 La. LEXIS 4973

Procedural entryThis page is a short order in In re Rebar Steel Antitrust Investigation. Read the opinion of the Court — 1977 La. LEXIS 6220 →

Supreme Court of Louisiana·Decided November 23, 1976·No. No. 58883·Published

Opinion

In re: Charles F. Jones, A. A. Boudous-quie, Jr., Richard M. Johnson and John W. Bean, applying for writ of review and a stay order.

Granted.

’ The petition of the relator in the above entitled and numbered case having been duly considered,

It is ordered that a writ of certiorari issue herein, directing the Honorable Rudolph Becker, III Judge of the Criminal District Court for the Parish of Orleans, to transmit to the Supreme court of Louisiana, on or before the 1st day of December, 1976, the record in duplicate, or a certified copy of the record in duplicate, of the proceedings complained of by the relator herein, to the end that the validity of said proceedings may be ascertained.

It is further ordered that the aforesaid Judge of said Court and the respondent through counsel shall show cause, in this court, on the 26th day of January, 1977, at 10 o’clock A.M., why the relief prayed for in the petition of the relator should not be granted.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

In re: Charles F. Jones, A. A. Boudous-quie, Jr., Richard M. Johnson and John W. Bean, applying for writ of review and a stay order.

Granted.

’ The petition of the relator in the above entitled and numbered case having been duly considered,

It is ordered that a writ of certiorari issue herein, directing the Honorable Rudolph Becker, III Judge of the Criminal District Court for the Parish of Orleans, to transmit to the Supreme court of Louisiana, on or before the 1st day of December, 1976, the record in duplicate, or a certified copy of the record in duplicate, of the proceedings complained of by the relator herein, to the end that the validity of said proceedings may be ascertained.

It is further ordered that the aforesaid Judge of said Court and the respondent through counsel shall show cause, in this court, on the 26th day of January, 1977, at 10 o’clock A.M., why the relief prayed for in the petition of the relator should not be granted.

In re Rebar Steel Antitrust Investigation, 339 So. 2d 354, 1976 La. LEXIS 4973 (La. 1976).

Pincite

339 So. 2d 354 (In re Rebar Steel Antitrust Investigation) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.