in Re Reba Ann and D.L. Johnson

Opinion

NUMBER 13-19-00216-CV

COURT OF APPEALS

THIRTEENTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS CORPUS CHRISTI - EDINBURG

IN RE REBA ANN JOHNSON AND D.L. JOHNSON

On Petition for Writ of Mandamus.

MEMORANDUM OPINION

Before Chief Justice Contreras and Justices Longoria and Perkes Memorandum Opinion by Justice Longoria 1

Relators Reba Ann Johnson and D.L. Johnson filed a petition for writ of mandamus with request for emergency relief in the above cause on May 6, 2019. Through this original proceeding, relators contend that the trial court abused its discretion by allowing discovery to proceed prior to the resolution of a pending motion to dismiss filed under the Texas Citizens Participation Act while relators are without counsel. Relators seek to stay all trial court proceedings pending resolution of their petition for writ of mandamus.

1 See TEX. R. APP. P. 52.8(d) (“When granting relief, the court must hand down an opinion as in any other case,” but when “denying relief, the court may hand down an opinion but is not required to do so.”); id. R. 47.4 (distinguishing opinions and memorandum opinions).

Mandamus is an extraordinary remedy issued at the discretion of the court. In re Garza, 544 S.W.3d 836, 840 (Tex. 2018) (orig. proceeding) (per curiam). To obtain relief by writ of mandamus, a relator must establish that an underlying order is void or a clear abuse of discretion and that no adequate appellate remedy exists. In re Nationwide Ins. Co. of Am., 494 S.W.3d 708, 712 (Tex. 2016) (orig. proceeding); In re Prudential Ins. Co. of Am., 148 S.W.3d 124, 135–36 (Tex. 2004) (orig. proceeding); Walker v. Packer, 827 S.W.2d 833, 839–40 (Tex. 1992) (orig. proceeding). The relator has the burden of providing the Court with a sufficient mandamus record to establish the right to mandamus relief. Walker, 827 S.W.2d at 837; In re Athans, 458 S.W.3d 675, 676 (Tex. App.— Houston [14th Dist.] 2015, orig. proceeding); see TEX. R. APP. P. 52.3(k) (specifying the required contents for the appendix); id. R. 52.7(a) (specifying the required contents for the record).

The Court, having examined and fully considered the petition for writ of mandamus, and the applicable law, is of the opinion that the relators have not met their burden to obtain mandamus relief. The petition is not in compliance with Texas Rule of Appellate Procedure 52 and lacks an appendix or record. See generally TEX. R. APP. P. 52.3; id. R. 52.7. Accordingly, we deny the petition for writ of mandamus and the request for temporary relief without prejudice.

NORA L. LONGORIA

Justice

Delivered and filed the 6th day of May, 2019.