In re Reality Associate Security Corp.

E.D. New York

In re Reality Associate Security Corp.

59 F. Supp. 830, 1945 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 2461

CourtDistrict Court, E.D. New York

DecidedFebruary 28, 1945

DocketNo. 45024

StatusPublished

This text of 59 F. Supp. 830 (In re Reality Associate Security Corp.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court, E.D. New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

In re Reality Associate Security Corp., 59 F. Supp. 830, 1945 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 2461 (E.D.N.Y. 1945).

Pincite

Opinion

MOSCOWITZ, District Judge.

This is a motion made by Bondholders’ Protective Committee for an order directing Walter McMeekan, J. Lester Fiennan, Frank E. Herma and Frederick S. Robinson, constituting the Bondholders’ Directors’ Committee, to jointly and severally pay to Bondholders’ Protective Committee the disbursements incurred in the proceeding heretofore had for the disqualification of Bondholders’ Directors’ Committee.

A motion was heretofore made herein based upon a notice of motion and petition dated and verified January 26, 1944, respectively, by the Bondholders’ Protective Committee to disqualify the Bondholders’ Directors’ Committee from acting as a committee of bondholders in this proceeding. In the consideration of such motion it was essential that testimony be taken and that the same be transcribed and submitted to the court and it was likewise essential that the counsel for the Bondholders’ Protective Committee have a transcript of such testimony.

On motion of Bondholders’ Protective Committee the Bondholders’ Directors’ Committee was disqualified from acting in this proceeding. The Bondholders’ Protective Committee seeks to be reimbursed for the disbursements amounting to $323.25 which represents the cost of the transcript of the minutes taken by the court reporter.

No good reason has been advanced why the winning side, the Bondholders’ Protective Committee, should not be reimbursed. It was successful on the application and its efforts were strenuously resisted ■ by the Bondholders’ Directors'’ Committee. It would be in the nature of a travesty if the Bondholders’ Protective Committee should not be reimbursed. No authorities have been cited by the counsel to the Bondholders’ Directors’ Committee to the contrary. It therefore is decided that in a Chapter X, 11 U.S.C.A. §§ 501-676, proceeding a committee which is successful in disqualifying and ousting another committee is entitled to reimbursement for Stenographer’s minutes.

Motion granted. Settle order on notice.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

MOSCOWITZ, District Judge.

This is a motion made by Bondholders’ Protective Committee for an order directing Walter McMeekan, J. Lester Fiennan, Frank E. Herma and Frederick S. Robinson, constituting the Bondholders’ Directors’ Committee, to jointly and severally pay to Bondholders’ Protective Committee the disbursements incurred in the proceeding heretofore had for the disqualification of Bondholders’ Directors’ Committee.

A motion was heretofore made herein based upon a notice of motion and petition dated and verified January 26, 1944, respectively, by the Bondholders’ Protective Committee to disqualify the Bondholders’ Directors’ Committee from acting as a committee of bondholders in this proceeding. In the consideration of such motion it was essential that testimony be taken and that the same be transcribed and submitted to the court and it was likewise essential that the counsel for the Bondholders’ Protective Committee have a transcript of such testimony.

On motion of Bondholders’ Protective Committee the Bondholders’ Directors’ Committee was disqualified from acting in this proceeding. The Bondholders’ Protective Committee seeks to be reimbursed for the disbursements amounting to $323.25 which represents the cost of the transcript of the minutes taken by the court reporter.

No good reason has been advanced why the winning side, the Bondholders’ Protective Committee, should not be reimbursed. It was successful on the application and its efforts were strenuously resisted ■ by the Bondholders’ Directors'’ Committee. It would be in the nature of a travesty if the Bondholders’ Protective Committee should not be reimbursed. No authorities have been cited by the counsel to the Bondholders’ Directors’ Committee to the contrary. It therefore is decided that in a Chapter X, 11 U.S.C.A. §§ 501-676, proceeding a committee which is successful in disqualifying and ousting another committee is entitled to reimbursement for Stenographer’s minutes.

Motion granted. Settle order on notice.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

59 F. Supp. 830, 1945 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 2461, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-reality-associate-security-corp-nyed-1945.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack