in Re: Raymond Wingfield, State Counsel for Offenders and Kim Vernon, Director of State Counsel for Offenders

CourtCourt of Appeals of Texas
DecidedJuly 29, 2005
Docket12-05-00151-CV
StatusPublished

This text of in Re: Raymond Wingfield, State Counsel for Offenders and Kim Vernon, Director of State Counsel for Offenders (in Re: Raymond Wingfield, State Counsel for Offenders and Kim Vernon, Director of State Counsel for Offenders) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
in Re: Raymond Wingfield, State Counsel for Offenders and Kim Vernon, Director of State Counsel for Offenders, (Tex. Ct. App. 2005).

Opinion

                     NO. 12-05-00151-CV

IN THE COURT OF APPEALS


TWELFTH COURT OF APPEALS DISTRICT


TYLER, TEXAS



§

IN RE: RAYMOND WINGFIELD,

STATE COUNSEL FOR OFFENDERS,

AND KIM VERNON, DIRECTOR,                  §     ORIGINAL PROCEEDING

RELATORS






MEMORANDUM OPINION

PER CURIAM

            On July 7, 2005, this Court delivered an opinion conditionally granting the petition for writ of mandamus filed by relators Raymond Wingfield, State Counsel for Offenders (SCFO), and Kim Vernon, SCFO Director. The opinion directed the respondent, the Honorable Jim Parsons, presiding judge of the 3rd Judicial District Court of Houston County, Texas, sitting in the 349th Judicial District Court of Houston County, to vacate his orders denying SCFO’s motion to strike the plea in intervention, denying SCFO’s motion to reconsider its motion to withdraw as counsel for Raymond Wingfield, and requiring the erection of a Chinese Wall. Further, the opinion directed the respondent to enter an order granting SCFO’s motion to strike the plea in intervention and SCFO’s motion to reconsider its motion to withdraw. On July 13, 2005, the respondent complied.

            All issues attendant to this original proceeding having now been disposed of, the writ need not issue. Accordingly, this original proceeding is dismissed as moot.

Opinion delivered July 29, 2005.

Panel consisted of Worthen, C.J., Griffith, J. and DeVasto, J.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
in Re: Raymond Wingfield, State Counsel for Offenders and Kim Vernon, Director of State Counsel for Offenders, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-raymond-wingfield-state-counsel-for-offender-texapp-2005.