In Re Raymond Reginald Peoples v. the State of Texas

CourtCourt of Appeals of Texas
DecidedFebruary 12, 2025
Docket09-25-00027-CR
StatusPublished

This text of In Re Raymond Reginald Peoples v. the State of Texas (In Re Raymond Reginald Peoples v. the State of Texas) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
In Re Raymond Reginald Peoples v. the State of Texas, (Tex. Ct. App. 2025).

Opinion

In The

Court of Appeals

Ninth District of Texas at Beaumont

__________________

NO. 09-25-00027-CR __________________

IN RE RAYMOND REGINALD PEOPLES

__________________________________________________________________

Original Proceeding Criminal District Court of Jefferson County, Texas Trial Cause No. DCR23-0727 __________________________________________________________________

MEMORANDUM OPINION

In a petition for a writ of mandamus, Raymond Reginald Peoples complains

that the trial court has repeatedly refused to issue a writ of habeas corpus and failed

to order the trial court clerk to issue subpoenas for a hearing on Peoples’ pre-trial

application for a writ of habeas corpus.

In a criminal case, to establish a right to mandamus relief a relator must show

that no adequate remedy at law exists to redress the alleged harm and that he is

seeking to compel a ministerial act, one that does not involve a discretionary or

judicial decision. See In re State ex rel. Young v. Sixth Jud. Dist. Ct. of Appeals at

1 Texarkana, 236 S.W.3d 207, 210 (Tex. Crim. App. 2007) (orig. proceeding). The

relator must show that he has a clear right to the relief sought under unequivocal,

well-settled and clearly controlling principles. Id.

We have reviewed the mandamus petition and appendix. We conclude that

Peoples has failed to establish that he has a clear right to the relief he seeks. See id.

Accordingly, we deny the petition for a writ of mandamus. See Tex. R. App. P.

52.8(a).

PETITION DENIED.

PER CURIAM

Submitted on February 11, 2025 Opinion Delivered February 12, 2025 Do Not Publish

Before Golemon, C.J., Johnson and Chambers, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

State ex rel. Young v. Sixth Judicial District Court of Appeals at Texarkana
236 S.W.3d 207 (Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas, 2007)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
In Re Raymond Reginald Peoples v. the State of Texas, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-raymond-reginald-peoples-v-the-state-of-texas-texapp-2025.