In re Raymond

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

In re Raymond

235 A.D.2d 627, 652 N.Y.S.2d 554, 1997 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 258

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedJanuary 7, 1997

StatusPublished

This text of 235 A.D.2d 627 (In re Raymond) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

In re Raymond, 235 A.D.2d 627, 652 N.Y.S.2d 554, 1997 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 258 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1997).

Pincite

Opinion

Per Curiam.

By decision dated December 8, 1994, respondent was suspended for a period of one year (Matter of Raymond, 210 AD2d 694). He now applies for reinstatement.

Our examination of the papers submitted on this application indicates that respondent has complied with the provisions of the order of suspension and with section 806.9 (22 NYCRR 806.9) of this Court’s rules regarding the conduct of suspended lawyers and that he has complied with the requirements of section 806.12 (22 NYCRR 806.12) regarding reinstatement. We also note with approval respondent’s participation in the Lawyer’s Assistance Program of the New York State Bar Association. Petitioner has advised that it does not oppose the application. Accordingly, the. application is granted and respondent is reinstated to the practice of law, effective immediately.

Cardona, P. J., Mercure, White, Casey and Carpinello, JJ., concur. Ordered that respondent’s application is granted and he is hereby reinstated as an attorney and counselor-at-law in the State of New York, effective immediately.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Per Curiam.

By decision dated December 8, 1994, respondent was suspended for a period of one year (Matter of Raymond, 210 AD2d 694). He now applies for reinstatement.

Our examination of the papers submitted on this application indicates that respondent has complied with the provisions of the order of suspension and with section 806.9 (22 NYCRR 806.9) of this Court’s rules regarding the conduct of suspended lawyers and that he has complied with the requirements of section 806.12 (22 NYCRR 806.12) regarding reinstatement. We also note with approval respondent’s participation in the Lawyer’s Assistance Program of the New York State Bar Association. Petitioner has advised that it does not oppose the application. Accordingly, the. application is granted and respondent is reinstated to the practice of law, effective immediately.

Cardona, P. J., Mercure, White, Casey and Carpinello, JJ., concur. Ordered that respondent’s application is granted and he is hereby reinstated as an attorney and counselor-at-law in the State of New York, effective immediately.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

235 A.D.2d 627, 652 N.Y.S.2d 554, 1997 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 258, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-raymond-nyappdiv-1997.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack