in Re: Raymond Greenhaw, Jr.
This text of in Re: Raymond Greenhaw, Jr. (in Re: Raymond Greenhaw, Jr.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
NO. 12-05-00026-CV
IN THE COURT OF APPEALS
TWELFTH COURT OF APPEALS DISTRICT
TYLER, TEXAS
§
IN RE: RAYMOND HOLLIS
GREENHAW, JR., § ORIGINAL PROCEEDING
RELATOR
MEMORANDUM OPINION
In this original proceeding, Greenhaw seeks an order directing the Honorable Jack Holland, Judge of the 173rd Judicial District Court, Henderson County, and/or the Honorable Carter Tarrance, Judge of the 392nd Judicial District Court, Henderson County, to vacate his conviction for aggravated sexual assault and conduct a new trial.
Section 11.07 of the Texas Code of Criminal Procedure prescribes the exclusive manner in which one can seek relief from a felony conviction. Board of Pardons and Paroles ex rel. Keene v. Court of Appeals for the Eighth Dist., 910 S.W.2d 481, 483 (Tex. Crim. App. 1995) (orig. proceeding). The court of criminal appeals is the only court with jurisdiction in those proceedings. Tex. Code Crim. Proc. Ann. art. 11.07 § 3 (Vernon Supp. 2004-2005); Ater v. Eighth Court of Appeals, 802 S.W.2d 241, 243 (Tex. Crim. App. 1991). Accordingly, the petition for writ of mandamus is denied.
DIANE DEVASTO
Justice
Opinion delivered February 23, 2005.
Panel consisted of Worthen, C.J., Griffith, J. and DeVasto, J.
(PUBLISH)
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
in Re: Raymond Greenhaw, Jr., Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-raymond-greenhaw-jr-texapp-2005.