In Re Raymond Choate and Kelly Mallady v. the State of Texas
This text of In Re Raymond Choate and Kelly Mallady v. the State of Texas (In Re Raymond Choate and Kelly Mallady v. the State of Texas) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Petition for Writ of Mandamus Denied and Memorandum Opinion filed March 21, 2023.
In The
Fourteenth Court of Appeals
NO. 14-22-00397-CV
IN RE RAYMOND CHOATE AND KELLY MALLADY, Relators
ORIGINAL PROCEEDING WRIT OF MANDAMUS County Civil Court at Law No. 1 Harris County, Texas Trial Court Cause No. 1180192
MEMORANDUM OPINION
Relators Raymond Choate and Kelly Mallady filed a joint petition for writ of mandamus in this Court. See Tex. Gov’t Code Ann. § 22.221; see also Tex. R. App. P. 52. In the petition, relators ask this Court to compel the Honorable Audrie Lawton-Evans, presiding judge of the County Civil Court at Law No. 1 of Harris County, to vacate the trial court’s April 12, 2022 order compelling relator Raymond Choate’s examination under oath. Relators have not established that they are entitled to mandamus relief. Accordingly, we deny relators’ petition for writ of mandamus.
PER CURIAM
Panel consists of Justices Zimmerer, Spain, and Poissant.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
In Re Raymond Choate and Kelly Mallady v. the State of Texas, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-raymond-choate-and-kelly-mallady-v-the-state-of-texas-texapp-2023.