In Re Raymond Choate and Kelly Mallady v. the State of Texas

Court of Appeals of Texas

In Re Raymond Choate and Kelly Mallady v. the State of Texas

Court of Appeals of Texas·Decided March 21, 2023·No. 14-22-00397-CV·Published

Opinion

Petition for Writ of Mandamus Denied and Memorandum Opinion filed March 21, 2023.

In The

Fourteenth Court of Appeals

NO. 14-22-00397-CV

IN RE RAYMOND CHOATE AND KELLY MALLADY, Relators

ORIGINAL PROCEEDING WRIT OF MANDAMUS County Civil Court at Law No. 1 Harris County, Texas Trial Court Cause No. 1180192

MEMORANDUM OPINION

Relators Raymond Choate and Kelly Mallady filed a joint petition for writ of mandamus in this Court. See Tex. Gov’t Code Ann. § 22.221; see also Tex. R. App. P. 52. In the petition, relators ask this Court to compel the Honorable Audrie Lawton-Evans, presiding judge of the County Civil Court at Law No. 1 of Harris County, to vacate the trial court’s April 12, 2022 order compelling relator Raymond Choate’s examination under oath. Relators have not established that they are entitled to mandamus relief. Accordingly, we deny relators’ petition for writ of mandamus.

PER CURIAM

Panel consists of Justices Zimmerer, Spain, and Poissant.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Petition for Writ of Mandamus Denied and Memorandum Opinion filed March 21, 2023.

In The

Fourteenth Court of Appeals

NO. 14-22-00397-CV

IN RE RAYMOND CHOATE AND KELLY MALLADY, Relators

ORIGINAL PROCEEDING WRIT OF MANDAMUS County Civil Court at Law No. 1 Harris County, Texas Trial Court Cause No. 1180192

MEMORANDUM OPINION

Relators Raymond Choate and Kelly Mallady filed a joint petition for writ of mandamus in this Court. See Tex. Gov’t Code Ann. § 22.221; see also Tex. R. App. P. 52. In the petition, relators ask this Court to compel the Honorable Audrie Lawton-Evans, presiding judge of the County Civil Court at Law No. 1 of Harris County, to vacate the trial court’s April 12, 2022 order compelling relator Raymond Choate’s examination under oath. Relators have not established that they are entitled to mandamus relief. Accordingly, we deny relators’ petition for writ of mandamus.

PER CURIAM

Panel consists of Justices Zimmerer, Spain, and Poissant.

In Re Raymond Choate and Kelly Mallady v. the State of Texas, (Tex. Ct. App. 2023).

Pincite

In Re Raymond Choate and Kelly Mallady v. the State of Texas (In Re Raymond Choate and Kelly Mallady v. the State of Texas) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.