In re Ray

Ohio Supreme Court

In re Ray

762 N.E.2d 1015, 94 Ohio St. 3d 1468, 2002 Ohio LEXIS 383

CourtOhio Supreme Court

DecidedFebruary 11, 2002

Docket01-625

StatusPublished

This text of 762 N.E.2d 1015 (In re Ray) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Ohio Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

In re Ray, 762 N.E.2d 1015, 94 Ohio St. 3d 1468, 2002 Ohio LEXIS 383 (Ohio 2002).

Pincite

Opinion

Hamilton App. Nos. C-000436 and C-000437. This cause is pending before the court as an appeal from the Court of Appeals for Hamilton County. Upon consideration of the joint motion of amici curiae Honorable Thomas E. Brinkman, Jr., Larry L. Flowers, Timothy J. Grendell, Jim Jordan, Linda Reidelbach, Twyla Roman, Michelle G. Schneider, and William J. Seitz III, members of the General Assembly of the state of Ohio, and amici curiae American Family Association of Ohio, Citizens for Community Values, Equal Rights Not Special Rights, Family First, and the National Legal Foundation to participate in oral argument scheduled for March 13, 2002,

IT IS ORDERED by the court that the motion of amici curiae to participate in oral argument be, and hereby is, granted, and amid curiae may present oral argument within the time usually allotted to appellee.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Hamilton App. Nos. C-000436 and C-000437. This cause is pending before the court as an appeal from the Court of Appeals for Hamilton County. Upon consideration of the joint motion of amici curiae Honorable Thomas E. Brinkman, Jr., Larry L. Flowers, Timothy J. Grendell, Jim Jordan, Linda Reidelbach, Twyla Roman, Michelle G. Schneider, and William J. Seitz III, members of the General Assembly of the state of Ohio, and amici curiae American Family Association of Ohio, Citizens for Community Values, Equal Rights Not Special Rights, Family First, and the National Legal Foundation to participate in oral argument scheduled for March 13, 2002,

IT IS ORDERED by the court that the motion of amici curiae to participate in oral argument be, and hereby is, granted, and amid curiae may present oral argument within the time usually allotted to appellee.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

762 N.E.2d 1015, 94 Ohio St. 3d 1468, 2002 Ohio LEXIS 383, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-ray-ohio-2002.