in Re Ray Anthony Scott

CourtCourt of Appeals of Texas
DecidedOctober 11, 2004
Docket03-04-00587-CV
StatusPublished

This text of in Re Ray Anthony Scott (in Re Ray Anthony Scott) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
in Re Ray Anthony Scott, (Tex. Ct. App. 2004).

Opinion

TEXAS COURT OF APPEALS, THIRD DISTRICT, AT AUSTIN



NO. 03-04-00587-CV
In re Ray Anthony Scott


ORIGINAL PROCEEDING FROM LEE COUNTY
M E M O R A N D U M O P I N I O N


This is an original mandamus proceeding. Relator Ray Anthony Scott asks this Court to order the respondent, the Honorable John L. Placke, Judge of the 21st Judicial District Court, to appoint counsel and otherwise act on Scott's motion for DNA testing. See Act of April 3, 2001, 77th Leg., R.S., ch. 2, § 2, 2001 Tex. Gen. Laws 2, 2-3 (amended Sep. 1, 2003) (current version at Tex. Code Crim. Proc. Ann. art. 64.01 (West Supp. 2004-05)).

Scott is serving a prison sentence for attempted capital murder. See Scott v. State, 968 S.W.2d 574 Tex. App.--Austin 1998, pet. ref'd). Scott's pro se motion for DNA testing and request for appointed counsel were filed on March 10, 2003. Under article 64.01(c) as it then read, Scott was statutorily entitled to appointed counsel if indigent. Winters v. Presiding Judge, 118 S.W.3d 773, 775 (Tex. Crim. App. 2003); Neveu v. Culver, 105 S.W.3d 641, 642 (Tex. Crim. App. 2003). To date, no action has been taken on Scott's motions.

We conditionally grant the petition for writ of mandamus. The respondent is directed to determine whether Scott is indigent and if so, to appoint counsel to represent him in this chapter 64 proceeding. The respondent is further directed to obtain the State's response to Scott's testing motion and to make the findings required by chapter 64. We withhold issuance of the writ to afford the respondent an opportunity to make issuance unnecessary.



__________________________________________

Bea Ann Smith, Justice

Before Justices Kidd, B. A. Smith and Puryear

Filed: October 11, 2004

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Neveu v. Culver
105 S.W.3d 641 (Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas, 2003)
Ray Anthony Scott v. State
968 S.W.2d 574 (Court of Appeals of Texas, 1998)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
in Re Ray Anthony Scott, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-ray-anthony-scott-texapp-2004.