in Re Ray Anthony Scott
This text of in Re Ray Anthony Scott (in Re Ray Anthony Scott) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
This is an original mandamus proceeding. Relator Ray Anthony Scott asks this Court to order the respondent, the Honorable John L. Placke, Judge of the 21st Judicial District Court, to appoint counsel and otherwise act on Scott's motion for DNA testing. See Act of April 3, 2001, 77th Leg., R.S., ch. 2, § 2, 2001 Tex. Gen. Laws 2, 2-3 (amended Sep. 1, 2003) (current version at Tex. Code Crim. Proc. Ann. art. 64.01 (West Supp. 2004-05)).
Scott is serving a prison sentence for attempted capital murder. See Scott v. State, 968 S.W.2d 574 Tex. App.--Austin 1998, pet. ref'd). Scott's pro se motion for DNA testing and request for appointed counsel were filed on March 10, 2003. Under article 64.01(c) as it then read, Scott was statutorily entitled to appointed counsel if indigent. Winters v. Presiding Judge, 118 S.W.3d 773, 775 (Tex. Crim. App. 2003); Neveu v. Culver, 105 S.W.3d 641, 642 (Tex. Crim. App. 2003). To date, no action has been taken on Scott's motions.
We conditionally grant the petition for writ of mandamus. The respondent is directed to determine whether Scott is indigent and if so, to appoint counsel to represent him in this chapter 64 proceeding. The respondent is further directed to obtain the State's response to Scott's testing motion and to make the findings required by chapter 64. We withhold issuance of the writ to afford the respondent an opportunity to make issuance unnecessary.
__________________________________________
Bea Ann Smith, Justice
Before Justices Kidd, B. A. Smith and Puryear
Filed: October 11, 2004
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
in Re Ray Anthony Scott, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-ray-anthony-scott-texapp-2004.