In Re Ray Adam Basaldua v. the State of Texas
This text of In Re Ray Adam Basaldua v. the State of Texas (In Re Ray Adam Basaldua v. the State of Texas) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Fourth Court of Appeals San Antonio, Texas
MEMORANDUM OPINION
No. 04-25-00189-CV
IN RE Ray Adam BASALDUA, Relator
Original Proceeding 1
PER CURIAM
Sitting: Rebeca C. Martinez, Chief Justice Lori I. Valenzuela, Justice H. Todd McCray, Justice
Delivered and Filed: April 9, 2025
PETITION FOR WRIT OF MANDAMUS DENIED
The court has considered the petition for a writ of mandamus filed by relator on March
24, 2025. Relator challenges the denial of an oral motion to recuse. “An order denying a motion
to recuse may be reviewed only for abuse of discretion on appeal from the final judgment.” TEX.
R. CIV. P. 18a(j). Intervention by appellate courts through the extraordinary writ of mandamus is
not statutorily authorized nor appropriate in this context. In re Union Pac. Res. Co., 969 S.W.2d
427, 428-29 (Tex. 1998). After considering the petition and the record, the court concludes
relator is not entitled to the relief sought and relief should be denied. See TEX. R. APP. P. 52.8(a).
Accordingly, relator’s petition for a writ of mandamus is denied.
1 This proceeding arises out of Cause No. 2024-CI-14126, styled Ray Adam Basaldua v. Sylvia Ramirez Cedillo and Judith Mena, pending in the 131st Judicial District Court, Bexar County, Texas, the Honorable Norma Gonzales presiding.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
In Re Ray Adam Basaldua v. the State of Texas, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-ray-adam-basaldua-v-the-state-of-texas-texapp-2025.