In Re: Ravin
This text of In Re: Ravin (In Re: Ravin) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
NOTE: This disposition is nonprecedential.
United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit ______________________
IN RE: SEAN A. RAVIN, Appellant ______________________
2017-1112 ______________________
Appeal from the United States Court of Appeals for Veterans Claims in No. 12-8004, Chief Judge Robert N. Davis, Senior Judge Lawrence B. Hagel, Judge Coral Wong Pietsch. ______________________
JUDGMENT ______________________
KENNETH M. CARPENTER, Law Offices of Carpenter Chartered, Topeka, KS, argued for appellant. ______________________
THIS CAUSE having been heard and considered, it is
ORDERED and ADJUDGED:
PER CURIAM (MOORE, SCHALL, and O’MALLEY, Circuit Judges). AFFIRMED. See Fed. Cir. R. 36. ENTERED BY ORDER OF THE COURT
July 12, 2017 /s/ Peter R. Marksteiner Date Peter R. Marksteiner Clerk of Court
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
In Re: Ravin, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-ravin-cafc-2017.