In re Rausch

Supreme Court of New Jersey

In re Rausch

134 A.3d 25, 224 N.J. 444, 2016 N.J. LEXIS 326

DecidedApril 21, 2016

StatusPublished

This text of 134 A.3d 25 (In re Rausch) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of New Jersey primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

In re Rausch, 134 A.3d 25, 224 N.J. 444, 2016 N.J. LEXIS 326 (N.J. 2016).

Pincite

Opinion

CORRECTED ORDER

The Disciplinary Review Board having filed with the Court its decision in DRB 15-176, concluding that MICHAEL P. RAUSCH of HADDONFIELD, who was admitted to the bar of this State in 1994, should be censured for violating RPC 8.4(b) (committing a criminal act that reflects adversely on a lawyer’s honesty, trustworthiness or fitness as a lawyer), and RPC 8.4(d) (engaging in conduct prejudicial to the administration of justice);

And the Court this date having granted respondent’s petition for review (R-4-15) in this matter, and having determined that the formal complaint filed in District Docket No. XIV-2010-0373E should be dismissed;

And good cause appearing;

It is ORDERED that the formal complaint in District Docket No. XIV-2010-0373E against MICHAEL P. RAUSCH is hereby dismissed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

CORRECTED ORDER

The Disciplinary Review Board having filed with the Court its decision in DRB 15-176, concluding that MICHAEL P. RAUSCH of HADDONFIELD, who was admitted to the bar of this State in 1994, should be censured for violating RPC 8.4(b) (committing a criminal act that reflects adversely on a lawyer’s honesty, trustworthiness or fitness as a lawyer), and RPC 8.4(d) (engaging in conduct prejudicial to the administration of justice);

And the Court this date having granted respondent’s petition for review (R-4-15) in this matter, and having determined that the formal complaint filed in District Docket No. XIV-2010-0373E should be dismissed;

And good cause appearing;

It is ORDERED that the formal complaint in District Docket No. XIV-2010-0373E against MICHAEL P. RAUSCH is hereby dismissed.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

134 A.3d 25, 224 N.J. 444, 2016 N.J. LEXIS 326, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-rausch-nj-2016.