In re Rasheid A.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

In re Rasheid A.

283 A.D.2d 372, 724 N.Y.S.2d 861, 2001 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 6604

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedMay 31, 2001

StatusPublished

This text of 283 A.D.2d 372 (In re Rasheid A.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

In re Rasheid A., 283 A.D.2d 372, 724 N.Y.S.2d 861, 2001 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 6604 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2001).

Pincite

Opinion

—Orders of disposition, Family Court, Bronx County (Marjory Fields, J.), entered on or about January 6, 1999, which, inter alia, removed the subject children from respondent mother’s custody and placed them with their father, upon a fact-finding determination that respondent had neglected the children, unanimously affirmed, without costs.

[373]*373Respondent’s brief appropriately concedes that there are no non-frivolous issues to review. Ample evidence supports the finding that respondent used excessive corporal punishment by striking the children with a belt (Family Ct Act § 1046 [b] [i]; see, Matter of Alena O., 220 AD2d 358, 360; Matter of J. Children, 220 AD2d 219). Ample evidence also supports the finding that placement of the children with their father, with services to be provided by petitioner Administration for Children’s Services, is in their best interests. Concur — Williams, J. P., Lerner, Rubin, Saxe and Buckley, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

—Orders of disposition, Family Court, Bronx County (Marjory Fields, J.), entered on or about January 6, 1999, which, inter alia, removed the subject children from respondent mother’s custody and placed them with their father, upon a fact-finding determination that respondent had neglected the children, unanimously affirmed, without costs.

[373]*373Respondent’s brief appropriately concedes that there are no non-frivolous issues to review. Ample evidence supports the finding that respondent used excessive corporal punishment by striking the children with a belt (Family Ct Act § 1046 [b] [i]; see, Matter of Alena O., 220 AD2d 358, 360; Matter of J. Children, 220 AD2d 219). Ample evidence also supports the finding that placement of the children with their father, with services to be provided by petitioner Administration for Children’s Services, is in their best interests. Concur — Williams, J. P., Lerner, Rubin, Saxe and Buckley, JJ.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

283 A.D.2d 372, 724 N.Y.S.2d 861, 2001 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 6604, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-rasheid-a-nyappdiv-2001.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack