In Re Rashad Brazier v. the State of Texas

Tex. App. Ct., 2nd Dist. (Fort Worth)

In Re Rashad Brazier v. the State of Texas

Texas Court of Appeals, 2nd District (Fort Worth)·Decided February 25, 2026·No. 02-26-00118-CV·Published

Opinion

FILED COURT OF APPEALS SECOND DISTRICT OF TEXAS

FEB 25 2026 CLARISSA HODGES, CLERK

In the

Court of Appeals Second Appellate District of Texas at Fort Worth

No. 02-26-00118-CV

IN RE RASHAD BRAZIER, Relator

Original Proceeding County Court at Law No. 1 of Tarrant County, Texas Trial Court No. 2026-000757-1

Before Walker, Kerr, and Birdwell, JJ. Per Curiam Memorandum Opinion

MEMORANDUM OPINION

The court has considered relator’s petition for writ of mandamus and motion for temporary telief and stay pending mandamus and is of the opinion that relief should be denied. Relator’s petition is not supported by authorities, is not supported by documentation, and is not certified. See Tex. R. App. 52.3(h), (j), (k). Neither Relator’s petition nor his motion identifies who the real party in interest is or shows that he has notified the trial court or the real party in interest that he has filed the petition and motion. See Tex. R. App. P. 52.2, 52.10(a). Accordingly, relator’s petition for writ of mandamus and motion for temporary telief and stay pending mandamus ate denied.

Per Curiam

Delivered: February 25, 2026

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

FILED COURT OF APPEALS SECOND DISTRICT OF TEXAS

FEB 25 2026 CLARISSA HODGES, CLERK

In the

Court of Appeals Second Appellate District of Texas at Fort Worth

No. 02-26-00118-CV

IN RE RASHAD BRAZIER, Relator

Original Proceeding County Court at Law No. 1 of Tarrant County, Texas Trial Court No. 2026-000757-1

Before Walker, Kerr, and Birdwell, JJ. Per Curiam Memorandum Opinion

MEMORANDUM OPINION

The court has considered relator’s petition for writ of mandamus and motion for temporary telief and stay pending mandamus and is of the opinion that relief should be denied. Relator’s petition is not supported by authorities, is not supported by documentation, and is not certified. See Tex. R. App. 52.3(h), (j), (k). Neither Relator’s petition nor his motion identifies who the real party in interest is or shows that he has notified the trial court or the real party in interest that he has filed the petition and motion. See Tex. R. App. P. 52.2, 52.10(a). Accordingly, relator’s petition for writ of mandamus and motion for temporary telief and stay pending mandamus ate denied.

Per Curiam

Delivered: February 25, 2026

In Re Rashad Brazier v. the State of Texas, (Tex. Ct. App. 2026).

Pincite

In Re Rashad Brazier v. the State of Texas (In Re Rashad Brazier v. the State of Texas) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.