In Re Rashad Brazier v. the State of Texas
This text of In Re Rashad Brazier v. the State of Texas (In Re Rashad Brazier v. the State of Texas) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Texas Court of Appeals, 2nd District (Fort Worth) primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
FILED COURT OF APPEALS SECOND DISTRICT OF TEXAS
FEB 25 2026 CLARISSA HODGES, CLERK
In the
Court of Appeals Second Appellate District of Texas at Fort Worth
No. 02-26-00118-CV
IN RE RASHAD BRAZIER, Relator
Original Proceeding County Court at Law No. 1 of Tarrant County, Texas Trial Court No. 2026-000757-1
Before Walker, Kerr, and Birdwell, JJ. Per Curiam Memorandum Opinion MEMORANDUM OPINION
The court has considered relator’s petition for writ of mandamus and motion for temporary telief and stay pending mandamus and is of the opinion that relief should be denied. Relator’s petition is not supported by authorities, is not supported by documentation, and is not certified. See Tex. R. App. 52.3(h), (j), (k). Neither Relator’s petition nor his motion identifies who the real party in interest is or shows that he has notified the trial court or the real party in interest that he has filed the petition and motion. See Tex. R. App. P. 52.2, 52.10(a). Accordingly, relator’s petition for writ of mandamus and motion for temporary telief and stay pending mandamus ate denied.
Per Curiam
Delivered: February 25, 2026
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
In Re Rashad Brazier v. the State of Texas, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-rashad-brazier-v-the-state-of-texas-txctapp2-2026.