In re Rascia

222 Ill. 2d 646
CourtIllinois Supreme Court
DecidedNovember 15, 2006
DocketMR 21229
StatusPublished

This text of 222 Ill. 2d 646 (In re Rascia) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Illinois Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
In re Rascia, 222 Ill. 2d 646 (Ill. 2006).

Opinion

Order of the Court:

The petition by the Administrator of the Attorney Registration and Disciplinary Commission to impose discipline on consent pursuant to Supreme Court Rule 762(b) is allowed, and respondent Robert Louis Rascia is suspended from the practice of law for three months. Suspension effective December 8, 2006. Respondent Robert Louis Rascia shall reimburse the Client Protection Trust Fund for any Client Protection payments arising from his conduct prior to the termination of the period of suspension.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
222 Ill. 2d 646, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-rascia-ill-2006.