In re Rasaad DeF.
This text of 49 A.D.3d 446 (In re Rasaad DeF.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
The court’s finding was based on legally sufficient evidence and was not against the weight of the evidence. There is no basis for disturbing the court’s determinations concerning credibility (see People v Bleakley, 69 NY2d 490, 495 [1987]). The evidence supports a reasonable inference that appellant threatened a police officer with an apparent pistol and then, while fleeing, divested himself of the object in a manner that escaped the notice of the pursuing police. Concur—Tom, J.P., Andrias, Nardelli and Sweeny, JJ.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
49 A.D.3d 446, 853 N.Y.2d 516, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-rasaad-def-nyappdiv-2008.