In re R.A.R.
This text of 464 N.W.2d 883 (In re R.A.R.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Iowa primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
In this appeal the appellant challenges the findings and commitment order of district associate judge Randal J. Nigg. The associate judge found R.A.R. was seriously mentally impaired and ordered involuntary hospitalization on an outpatient basis. R.A.R. filed a notice of appeal asking the district court to review the associate judge’s findings pursuant to Iowa Code section 229.21(4) (1989). District Judge Alan L. Pearson concluded the appellate process described in section 229.21(4) applied to findings of a hospital referee but not to findings of an associate judge. The district judge dismissed the appeal. We affirm.
On appeal to us, R.A.R. urges that the findings of the associate judge, acting as a magistrate, were reviewable by the district court. R.A.R. does not claim the associate judge was acting as a hospitalization referee 1 or with the authority of a district judge.2 In civil commitment proceedings, an associate judge has the jurisdiction provided for magistrates, and while exercising that jurisdiction, employs magistrates’ practice and procedure. Iowa Code § 602.6306(1). Appeals from judgments or orders of associate judges while exercising the jurisdiction of magistrates are governed by the laws relating to the appeals from judgments and orders of magistrates. Iowa Code § 602.6306(4). R.A.R. claims that the procedure for appeal to the district court in small claims actions, Iowa Code § 631.13, should be applied here.
The fundamental issue raised by this appeal is jurisdictional, not procedural. Associate judges have the jurisdiction provided for magistrates. Iowa Code § 602.6306(1). R.A.R. relies upon this section as authority for an associate judge acting as a magistrate to make a civil commitment. Section 602.6405 provides:
1. Magistrates have jurisdiction of simple misdemeanors, including traffic and ordinance violations, and preliminary hearings, search warrant proceedings, county and municipal infractions, and small claims. They also have jurisdiction ... to hear complaints or preliminary informations, issue warrants, order arrests, make commitments, and take bail.
We conclude the type of commitment authority provided under this section relates only to criminal proceedings such as those referred to in Iowa Code sections 804.22 and 804.25-.27. A magistrate has only limited jurisdiction in hospitalization proceedings. Only under section 229.22 is a magistrate permitted to participate in a hospitalization proceeding. This section provides that a magistrate may enter an order continuing the detention of a person who is hospitalized under an emergency procedure. Neither an associate judge nor a magistrate has jurisdiction to enter a civil commitment order.
Although the associate judge was acting in good faith, he had no authority to enter commitment orders under the provisions of Iowa Code section 229.12. The associate judge’s commitment order is void. The district court’s dismissal order is affirmed. Because of this ruling, we need not address other issues raised in the appeal.
AFFIRMED.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
464 N.W.2d 883, 1991 Iowa Sup. LEXIS 3, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-rar-iowa-1991.