In Re Rapken

California Court of Appeal

In Re Rapken

295 P. 344, 111 Cal. App. 107, 1931 Cal. App. LEXIS 1251

CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal

DecidedJanuary 15, 1931

DocketDocket No. 7845.

StatusPublished

Cited by6 cases

This text of 295 P. 344 (In Re Rapken) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering California Court of Appeal primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

In Re Rapken, 295 P. 344, 111 Cal. App. 107, 1931 Cal. App. LEXIS 1251 (Cal. Ct. App. 1931).

Pincite

Opinion

THE COURT.

Application for a writ of prohibition to prohibit the trial court from hearing an anticipated contempt proceeding for failure to comply with a court order. *Page 108 [1] The petition does not set forth any of the court minutes, records, or citations from which it appears that any such proceeding is contemplated. The document set forth on page 5 of the petition is merely a subpoena, in the usual form, to appear as a witness in a proceeding pending before the court. While the petition alleges on page 5 that in pursuance of the subpoena the court proceeded "on the return date, and many times thereafter to hear and try this petition, based on said subpoena for contempt", etc., and "has proceeded to try her for contempt as a result of and based solely on said subpoena over the objections of petitioner" etc., the petitioner has not set forth the court minutes, or a transcript of the testimony, or something else of record to show that this has been done. All we have is the conclusion of the petitioner.

The petition is denied.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

THE COURT.

Application for a writ of prohibition to prohibit the trial court from hearing an anticipated contempt proceeding for failure to comply with a court order. *Page 108 [1] The petition does not set forth any of the court minutes, records, or citations from which it appears that any such proceeding is contemplated. The document set forth on page 5 of the petition is merely a subpoena, in the usual form, to appear as a witness in a proceeding pending before the court. While the petition alleges on page 5 that in pursuance of the subpoena the court proceeded "on the return date, and many times thereafter to hear and try this petition, based on said subpoena for contempt", etc., and "has proceeded to try her for contempt as a result of and based solely on said subpoena over the objections of petitioner" etc., the petitioner has not set forth the court minutes, or a transcript of the testimony, or something else of record to show that this has been done. All we have is the conclusion of the petitioner.

The petition is denied.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

295 P. 344, 111 Cal. App. 107, 1931 Cal. App. LEXIS 1251, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-rapken-calctapp-1931.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack