In re Ranzal

235 A.D. 796

This text of 235 A.D. 796 (In re Ranzal) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
In re Ranzal, 235 A.D. 796 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1932).

Opinion

Order appointing a referee and denying motion to dismiss the petition reversed on the law and the facts, with ten dollars costs and disbursements, and motion to dismiss petition granted, with ten dollars costs. Every issue of fact and question of law urged here should be passed upon in the foreclosure action. Hagarty, Carswell, Seudder, Tompkins and Davis, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
235 A.D. 796, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-ranzal-nyappdiv-1932.