In re Ranftle

New York Court of Appeals

In re Ranftle

7 N.E.3d 500, 22 N.Y.3d 1146

New York Court of Appeals·Decided March 27, 2014·Published·Cited by 3 cases

Opinion

OPINION OF THE COURT

On review of submissions pursuant to section 500.11 of the Rules of the Court of Appeals (22 NYCRR 500.11), order affirmed, with costs, and certified question not answered upon the ground that it is unnecessary. The affirmed findings of fact regarding decedent’s change of domicile, made under the proper evidentiary standard, have support in the record and are beyond our further review.

Concur: Chief Judge Lippman and Judges Graffeo, Read, Smith, Pigott and Rivera. Taking no part: Judge AbdusSalaam.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

OPINION OF THE COURT

On review of submissions pursuant to section 500.11 of the Rules of the Court of Appeals (22 NYCRR 500.11), order affirmed, with costs, and certified question not answered upon the ground that it is unnecessary. The affirmed findings of fact regarding decedent’s change of domicile, made under the proper evidentiary standard, have support in the record and are beyond our further review.

Concur: Chief Judge Lippman and Judges Graffeo, Read, Smith, Pigott and Rivera. Taking no part: Judge AbdusSalaam.

In re Ranftle, 7 N.E.3d 500, 22 N.Y.3d 1146 (N.Y. 2014).

Pincite

7 N.E.3d 500 (In re Ranftle) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related