In re Ranftle

New York Court of Appeals

In re Ranftle

7 N.E.3d 500, 22 N.Y.3d 1146

CourtNew York Court of Appeals

DecidedMarch 27, 2014

StatusPublished

Cited by3 cases

This text of 7 N.E.3d 500 (In re Ranftle) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering New York Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

In re Ranftle, 7 N.E.3d 500, 22 N.Y.3d 1146 (N.Y. 2014).

Pincite

Opinion

OPINION OF THE COURT

On review of submissions pursuant to section 500.11 of the Rules of the Court of Appeals (22 NYCRR 500.11), order affirmed, with costs, and certified question not answered upon the ground that it is unnecessary. The affirmed findings of fact regarding decedent’s change of domicile, made under the proper evidentiary standard, have support in the record and are beyond our further review.

Concur: Chief Judge Lippman and Judges Graffeo, Read, Smith, Pigott and Rivera. Taking no part: Judge AbdusSalaam.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

OPINION OF THE COURT

On review of submissions pursuant to section 500.11 of the Rules of the Court of Appeals (22 NYCRR 500.11), order affirmed, with costs, and certified question not answered upon the ground that it is unnecessary. The affirmed findings of fact regarding decedent’s change of domicile, made under the proper evidentiary standard, have support in the record and are beyond our further review.

Concur: Chief Judge Lippman and Judges Graffeo, Read, Smith, Pigott and Rivera. Taking no part: Judge AbdusSalaam.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

7 N.E.3d 500, 22 N.Y.3d 1146, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-ranftle-ny-2014.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack