In re Randy NN.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

In re Randy NN.

247 A.D.2d 710, 668 N.Y.S.2d 509, 1998 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 976

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedFebruary 5, 1998

StatusPublished

Cited by3 cases

This text of 247 A.D.2d 710 (In re Randy NN.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

In re Randy NN., 247 A.D.2d 710, 668 N.Y.S.2d 509, 1998 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 976 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1998).

Pincite

Opinion

Mikoll, J.

Appeal from an order of the Family Court of Sullivan County (Mizel, J.), entered February 19, 1997, which granted petitioner’s application, in a proceeding pursuant to Family Court Act article 3, to extend respondent’s placement with petitioner.

Respondent maintains that petitioner’s request for an extension of his placement had an insufficient basis and Family Court abused its discretion in granting the request following a hearing (see, Family Ct Act § 355.3 [4]). Regardless of the merit of these assertions, the subject appeal is now moot as a result of the expiration of the six-month placement period that was directed in the order before this Court for its review (see, Matter of Donald MM., 241 AD2d 634). Accordingly, this appeal must be dismissed in that respondent has now received the [711]*711precise relief he sought from this Court, namely, his release from petitioner’s custody.

Cardona, P. J., Crew III, Yesawich Jr. and Peters, JJ., concur.

Ordered that the appeal is dismissed, as moot, without costs.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Mikoll, J.

Appeal from an order of the Family Court of Sullivan County (Mizel, J.), entered February 19, 1997, which granted petitioner’s application, in a proceeding pursuant to Family Court Act article 3, to extend respondent’s placement with petitioner.

Respondent maintains that petitioner’s request for an extension of his placement had an insufficient basis and Family Court abused its discretion in granting the request following a hearing (see, Family Ct Act § 355.3 [4]). Regardless of the merit of these assertions, the subject appeal is now moot as a result of the expiration of the six-month placement period that was directed in the order before this Court for its review (see, Matter of Donald MM., 241 AD2d 634). Accordingly, this appeal must be dismissed in that respondent has now received the [711]*711precise relief he sought from this Court, namely, his release from petitioner’s custody.

Cardona, P. J., Crew III, Yesawich Jr. and Peters, JJ., concur.

Ordered that the appeal is dismissed, as moot, without costs.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

247 A.D.2d 710, 668 N.Y.S.2d 509, 1998 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 976, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-randy-nn-nyappdiv-1998.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack