In re: Randy McRae

171 A.3d 1145
District of Columbia Court of Appeals·Decided October 26, 2017·No. 17-BG-224·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM

On consideration of the certified order from the United States District Court for the District of Maryland disbarring respondent from the practice of law, this court's April 26, 2017, order suspending respondent pending resolution of this matter and directing him to show cause why reciprocal discipline should not be imposed, the response thereto, the statement of Disciplinary Counsel, respondent's exceptions, and the reply of Disciplinary Counsel; respondent's motion to lift suspension and stay the case, the opposition of Disciplinary Counsel, and the reply thereto; respondent's supplemental D.C. Bar R. XI, § 14 (g) affidavit, second supplemental affidavit, and responses of Disciplinary Counsel, and it appearing that Disciplinary Counsel was not served the supplements and did not receive the supplemental affidavits until October 13, 2017, after being notified by the court, it is

ORDERED that Randy McRae is hereby disbarred from the practice of law nunc pro tunc to October 13, 2017. See In re Sibley , 990 A.2d 483 (D.C. 2010) ; In re Fuller , 930 A.2d 194 , 198 (D.C. 2007) (rebuttable presumption of identical reciprocal discipline applies to all cases in which the respondent does not participate). It is

FURTHER ORDERED that respondent's motion to lift suspension and stay the case is denied as moot.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

In re: Randy McRae, 171 A.3d 1145 (D.C. 2017).

171 A.3d 1145 (In re: Randy McRae) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

In Re Sibley
990 A.2d 483 (District of Columbia Court of Appeals, 2010)
In Re Fuller
930 A.2d 194 (District of Columbia Court of Appeals, 2007)