In re Randolph McNutt Co.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

In re Randolph McNutt Co.

232 A.D. 721

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedJanuary 15, 1931

StatusPublished

Cited by1 cases

This text of 232 A.D. 721 (In re Randolph McNutt Co.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

In re Randolph McNutt Co., 232 A.D. 721 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1931).

Pincite

Opinion

Order affirmed, without costs of this appeal to either party upon the ground that the city comptroller had no authority to reaudit the claim of petitioner, the claim'having been properly audited by the board of education and the'supplies having been bought for use in the public schools of the city and sufficient funds being on deposit with the city treasurer to the credit of the board of education with which to pay the bill. (Matter of Fleischman v. Graves, 235 N. Y. 84; People ex rel. Wells & Newton Co. v. Craig, 232 id. 125; Matter of Poucher v. Berry, 249 id. 16; Matter of Brennan v. Board of Education, 245 id. 8; Matter of Board of Education v. Dibble, 136 Misc. 171.) This decision is not to be taken as indicating our approval of the form of the specifications for the furniture and supplies of which the desks involved are a part. All concur. Present — Sears, P. J., Crouch, Taylor, Edgcomb and Thompson, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Order affirmed, without costs of this appeal to either party upon the ground that the city comptroller had no authority to reaudit the claim of petitioner, the claim'having been properly audited by the board of education and the'supplies having been bought for use in the public schools of the city and sufficient funds being on deposit with the city treasurer to the credit of the board of education with which to pay the bill. (Matter of Fleischman v. Graves, 235 N. Y. 84; People ex rel. Wells & Newton Co. v. Craig, 232 id. 125; Matter of Poucher v. Berry, 249 id. 16; Matter of Brennan v. Board of Education, 245 id. 8; Matter of Board of Education v. Dibble, 136 Misc. 171.) This decision is not to be taken as indicating our approval of the form of the specifications for the furniture and supplies of which the desks involved are a part. All concur. Present — Sears, P. J., Crouch, Taylor, Edgcomb and Thompson, JJ.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

232 A.D. 721, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-randolph-mcnutt-co-nyappdiv-1931.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack