In re Randolp

Fourth Circuit

In re Randolp

689 F. App'x 754

CourtCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit

DecidedMay 25, 2017

DocketNo. 17-1211, No. 17-1381

StatusPublished

This text of 689 F. App'x 754 (In re Randolp) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

In re Randolp, 689 F. App'x 754 (4th Cir. 2017).

Pincite

Opinion

[755]*755Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

In these consolidated appeals, Catherine Denise Randolph appeals the district court’s orders returning her complaints because they were not in compliance with the preñling injunction. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we deny leave to proceed in forma pauperis and dismiss the appeals. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

[755]*755Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

In these consolidated appeals, Catherine Denise Randolph appeals the district court’s orders returning her complaints because they were not in compliance with the preñling injunction. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we deny leave to proceed in forma pauperis and dismiss the appeals. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

689 F. App'x 754, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-randolp-ca4-2017.