In re Randolp

Fourth Circuit

In re Randolp

689 F. App'x 754

Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit·Decided May 25, 2017·No. No. 17-1211, No. 17-1381·Published

Opinion

[755] Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

In these consolidated appeals, Catherine Denise Randolph appeals the district court’s orders returning her complaints because they were not in compliance with the preñling injunction. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we deny leave to proceed in forma pauperis and dismiss the appeals. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

[755] Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

In these consolidated appeals, Catherine Denise Randolph appeals the district court’s orders returning her complaints because they were not in compliance with the preñling injunction. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we deny leave to proceed in forma pauperis and dismiss the appeals. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED

In re Randolp, 689 F. App'x 754 (4th Cir. 2017).

Pincite

689 F. App'x 754 (In re Randolp) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.